Disruption Involves Taking Chances


I am a fiscal conservative (I want to balance the budget) and a social moderate. I voted for Hillary Clinton for president because Donald Trump is a sleazy person and has such a volatile temperament.  But I’m also in favor of making big changes and Mr. Trump will certainly do this.

capture79As the Economist points out, “his voters took Mr. Trump seriously but not literally, even as his critics took him literally but not seriously.”  The Economist goes on to point out some of the risks involved in making the kinds of changes Mr. Trump is talking about:

    • If Obamacare is repealed, 20 million Americans will lose their health insurance. Yes, but it’s not going to happen this way. Obamacare will end up being modified and improved, not abolished.
  • His tax cuts would chiefly benefit the rich and would greatly increase our national debt. Yes, but the House of Representatives has a much better plan to do this and it is Congress, not Mr. Trump, which will develop a detailed plan.
  • Even if he does not actually deport illegal immigrants, he will foment the divisive politics of race. The illegal immigration problem needs to be solved and Mr. Trump is likely to get this done, with or without a wall.
  • Mr. Trump has demanded trade concessions from China and NAFTA. If he causes a trade war, the fragile world economy could tip into a recession. Blue collar workers, his strongest base of support, have had stagnant incomes for years and deserve some help. If he can increase our exports, blue collar workers will benefit.
  • He wants to reverse the Paris agreement on climate change which would harm the planet and undermine America as a negotiating partner. Global warming is real but the Paris accord does essentially nothing to slow it down. Increased coal use in China and India will more than negate what the U.S. and Western Europe are doing to cut back on fossil fuels.
  • Mr. Trump has demanded that other countries pay more towards their security or he will walk away. NATO members should be doing more on their own and if he can prod them to do this, then NATO will be stronger as a result.


Conclusion. Mr. Trump’s expressed views should be interpreted as initial bargaining positions. They are likely to have the effect of leading to progress on many serious problems which need to be addressed.  The risks involved in the negotiation process are worth taking

Follow me on Twitter
Follow me on Facebook

6 thoughts on “Disruption Involves Taking Chances

  1. Jack, while I do not know your definition of “sleazy,” I do understand what you meant by “volatile.” I voted for Trump both because I view Ms. Clinton as being sleazy in her handling of government Email and official records along with the apparent “pay for play” operations of the Clinton Foundation and the reports from within her staff and from government officials that she has a volatile temperament.

    • Sleazy: cheap, or not socially acceptable especially relating to moral or sexual matters. Donald Trump certainly meets this definition of Sleazy. Hopefully he will now improve in this respect.
      Even though I voted against Trump, he is a change agent and we need change big time.

  2. Jack,
    I cannot disagree with any of your general judgments. We can only hope that he can find some way to do what he claims to want to do. And only then, can we pass judgment. Except to add, I fear that he is more than a “sleazy” person. One’s personality cannot be so dramatically altered because of a single event whether it is acquiring the Presidency or anything else. It is the short temper and destructive or harmful former practices that unsettle me. Let’s hope for the best.

    On the social side of the Presidency, I do think Nell Irwin Painter’s article, “What Whiteness Means in the Trump Era” in last weekend’s NYTimes was the most perceptive article I have read so far from the press. W.E.B. DuBois saw the 20th c. as the greatest problem of the color line. That problem seems as prominent as it was identified in the 1960s.


    • The article you refer to in yesterday’s NYT twists Trump’s slogan, “Make America Great Again” into “Make America White Again.” No doubt there are millions of Americans who would agree with the author however I strongly disagree. Even though I do regard Trump as sleazy, I do not regard him as racist.

      • I would refer you to his practices of denying blacks access to moving into his apartments and the legal result. i also would refer you to his comments about his black accountants.

  3. I’m not familiar with these matters from his private life. I don’t believe he was racist in the campaign. His disparaging remarks about Latinos were referring to illegal immigrants. His remarks about Muslims were referring to terrorists.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s