New coronavirus infections in the U.S. have leveled off at about 30,000 per day and we are beginning to turn our focus to the reopening the American economy.
As China increasingly becomes the main challenger to U.S. world leadership, how has the coronavirus pandemic affected the relative standing of these two largest world powers? (see here, here, and here)
Pertinent to this question, Ruchir Sharma, the Chief Global Strategist at Moran Stanley Investment, has a very informative article in the latest edition of Foreign Affairs, “The Comeback Nation.”
Mr. Sharma points out that:
- The U.S. share of world-wide nominal GDP was 25% in 1980 and remained at 25% in 2020. During the same time period, China’s share grew from 2% to 16% and the EU’s share dropped from 35% to 21%.
- 90% of global financial transactions use the dollar. The share of countries which use the dollar as their anchor currency (including China) has risen from 30% in 1950 to 60% today. Because the U.S. Federal Reserve controls the supply of dollars, it is now, more than ever, the world’s central bank. Whether or not global elites trust the current U.S. president, they do trust U.S. institutions, which is why the U.S. is now a financial empire without rivals.
- Signs are that the coronavirus pandemic will even further entrench the dollar at the center of the global financial system.
- Ever since Gallup started asking Americans, in 1979, whether they were satisfied with how their lives were going, the vast majority have said yes. In January 2020, that share hit a record 90%.
- The median household income in 2018, adjusted for inflation, was $63,000, an increase of $15,000 from the early 1970s, and of $7000 since 2013.
- For all the talk of decline and despair, the bigger risk for the future is complacency in the face of growing threats from debt, deficits and demographics.
- U.S. productivity has gotten a boost from investment in technology in recent years, but the most important U.S. advantage has been a relatively high population growth rate, babies and immigrants, not Stanford and Google.
- Unfortunately, major voices in both parties are now making the case that deficits no longer pose a threat to growth – Republicans to defend low taxes and Democrats to defend higher public spending.
- If, into the future, China and the U.S. each maintained their officially reported nominal GDP growth rates, 6% for China and 4% for the U.S., China would not catch up with the U.S. until 2050. If its growth rate slows by one percentage point, China will not catch up with the U.S. until 2090.
- The most important driver of any economy is the working-age population, which is still growing in the U.S. but started shrinking in China five years ago.
Conclusion. Perhaps “the experts may be correct to argue that the United States should modernize its global strategy, restore ties to traditional allies and critical trade partners, rejoin international agreements, and help rebuild the international pillars of the postwar order.” But such moves would be icing on the cake. They are not needed to preserve U.S. leadership because the United States is not in decline.
it might be important to clarify that your are commenting on the economic status of the United States and not our leadership influence with other countries.
The chief determinant of our influence in world affairs (i.e.leadership) is our relative economic and political strength. China is our main rival by far at this time. So how we compare to China is a very pertinent question.
As Sharma says, whether or not other foreign leaders like Trump or not is less important. They will still respect (and follow) the U.S. if we are strong and they like our system.
The Clinton-Bush-Obama legacy is one of total indifference to the American taxpayer-worker-voter. The American people were dealt a losing hand, year after year. Its going to take decades to undo the damage.
This is the big mistake which the Democratic Party has made in recent years: ignoring the interests of the working class voter. So far they are not yet responding to this big weakness in their policy proposals. Will they figure this out? I don’t know!
We have yet to understand whether or not China will be politically stable in 5 years. Their attempt to enlighten their economic growth with professional education of their elite in the USA could politically back-fire on the basis of how they manage intellectual assets. Bringing back our pharmaceutical supply change could trigger a ripple effect. Highly centralized, authoritarian, autocratic, and coercive governments don’t last long. Hmm, should I say more?
I agree with you that China is politically unstable and is likely to have a huge political crisis within the next five years. While maintaining our own military and economic strength, we should also continue to cooperate with China on common problems such as the coronavirus pandemic now and climate change going forward.
In the meantime, we should definitely become more self sufficient with critical items such pharmaceutical supply chains.
True, true, and related!